Unsubscribe any time. We respect your data. View the privacy policy.
It doesn’t matter if you’re writing an email, a blog post, or a tweet—the full gamut of attention-seeking and attention-keeping tactics apply. Social
Imagine you’ve been asked to have an important conversation with ... ‘someone’. Chances are, you’ll be much happier to have that conversation if
These folks are some of the most innovative and transformative communicators in (and beyond) our movement. And they’re on a mission to help
Okay, back up—what’s a ‘value proposition’? Think of your value proposition as the reason your reader should care about investing
For several years, I drove a strategy at Animals Australia to send ‘thank-you’ emails to action takers that were jam-packed with followup
Does this sound familiar? Back up your position with facts; the more reasons you can offer, the more persuasive your argument. Right?
Serious question. Success is more than a number. It’s an outcome. An increase in list size isn’t an end-goal; 1,000
I’m not saying don’t do heroic things. Keep that up! But when you’re telling your supporters a story of injustice, there’s only
So you’ve cracked the code to writing a great email. The next step is to push it out to as many people
How does the past experience of people on your list influence their interest in receiving ongoing email from you? It turns out
We have Homer Simpson to thank for the term that perfectly describes a communication model that turbocharges action requests with urgency. Because
Consider the moment before your supporter decides whether to open your email. They must sacrifice something in order to give you their attention.
Most of us have a hard time keeping on top of emails from people we do know, to let alone give a second
Well-designed email templates are greeeat. But even the best layouts can lull readers into complacency over time. Consider mixing up your formatting occasionally
Think of digital pipelines as pathways that lead your supporters down progressively deeper levels of engagement. Without designing your pipelines intentionally, your supporters
How tempting is it to ‘bust myths’ and confront your opponent’s ridiculous claims head-on!? Hint: very. Proceed with caution—countering false claims can unintentionally reinforce them.
However, if you can reframe the conversation, you get to own it. With a little linguistic gymnastics, you can force your opponent to use your frame.
When live exporters assert that their trade is “not cruel”, what’s the one thing most people think of? That’s right. Cruelty.
Frame Conceded:
“You won’t miss out on protein and iron by eating these plant-based foods!”
“New live export regulations won’t protect animals.”
Frame Owned:
“These plant-based foods are packed with iron and protein!”
“New live export regulations only reinforce cruelty.”
Was this tip useful?
Like this tip? Share it!
