Unsubscribe any time. We respect your data. View the privacy policy.
Imagine you’ve been asked to have an important conversation with ... ‘someone’. Chances are, you’ll be much happier to have that conversation if
Trying something risky and new? These methodologies can save you from diving in head first when it might have been wiser to test
Does this sound familiar? Back up your position with facts; the more reasons you can offer, the more persuasive your argument. Right?
Most of us have a hard time keeping on top of emails from people we do know, to let alone give a second
Preview text appears in most email clients in the form of a few words after or below a subject line. While it doesn’t
What draws people to your cause? What motivated your supporters to take their first action? What did they feel when they first donated?
For several years, I drove a strategy at Animals Australia to send ‘thank-you’ emails to action takers that were jam-packed with followup
Here’s how the internal dialog usually goes: “We’re torn. We see other organizations sending from individual people but how do we know if
It might seem too obvious to mention. But it’s critical that you’ve defined the objective of your email. Often, it’s to lead your
Consider the moment before your supporter decides whether to open your email. They must sacrifice something in order to give you their attention.
Imagine you’re at a party. There are plenty of new people you could meet and talk to. There’s a guy talking himself up.
It can feel intuitive to place your action form elements at the end of your page—after your theory of change. However, your supporter
I’m not saying don’t do heroic things. Keep that up! But when you’re telling your supporters a story of injustice, there’s only
The education system taught many of us that long words and complex sentence structures are signs of sophistication. Un-learn this as fast
Think of digital pipelines as pathways that lead your supporters down progressively deeper levels of engagement. Without designing your pipelines intentionally, your supporters
How tempting is it to ‘bust myths’ and confront your opponent’s ridiculous claims head-on!? Hint: very. Proceed with caution—countering false claims can unintentionally reinforce them.
However, if you can reframe the conversation, you get to own it. With a little linguistic gymnastics, you can force your opponent to use your frame.
When live exporters assert that their trade is “not cruel”, what’s the one thing most people think of? That’s right. Cruelty.
Frame Conceded:
“You won’t miss out on protein and iron by eating these plant-based foods!”
“New live export regulations won’t protect animals.”
Frame Owned:
“These plant-based foods are packed with iron and protein!”
“New live export regulations only reinforce cruelty.”
Was this tip useful?
Like this tip? Share it!
