Unsubscribe any time. We respect your data. View the privacy policy.
Serious question. Success is more than a number. It’s an outcome. An increase in list size isn’t an end-goal; 1,000
It can feel intuitive to place your action form elements at the end of your page—after your theory of change. However, your supporter
I’m not saying don’t do heroic things. Keep that up! But when you’re telling your supporters a story of injustice, there’s only
You might know definitively that your call-to-action (CTA) is the single-most strategic thing your supporters can do today to help your cause.
When it comes to targeting the best supporters for specific activities, many of us are using (or have used) the sub-list model.
New to SEO? Here’s what works in 2026. If the currency of the Internet is web traffic, then search engine referrals are money
Imagine you’re at a party. There are plenty of new people you could meet and talk to. There’s a guy talking himself up.
For several years, I drove a strategy at Animals Australia to send ‘thank-you’ emails to action takers that were jam-packed with followup
SPOILER: it’s not good. Sure—you know you’re writing an email to 5,000 people. But your task is to make your reader feel like
Think of split testing (or AB testing) like a deathmatch for ideas. It’s the best tool we have for figuring out what works
Whatever you do—don’t just imagine your headline on your page itself. Consider how your headline performs without the rest of your page to
Of all the ‘rules’ out there for writing page headlines, this is the most transformative. If your headline sits on a petition
How tempting is it to ‘bust myths’ and confront your opponent’s ridiculous claims head-on!? Hint: very. Proceed with caution—countering false claims can unintentionally
These folks are some of the most innovative and transformative communicators in (and beyond) our movement. And they’re on a mission to help
One of the hardest lessons to learn as a communicator is knowing what not to say. In a medium that forces us
It’s not hard to preach to the choir. Or to mount an argument so agreeable that it won’t offend or challenge anyone. The business of wide-scale change-making affords us neither of these luxuries. Since you’re reading this, let’s assume it’s your job to reach the masses and challenge the status quo. Welcome to fiery opposition hitting you from both sides of the divide.
The more polarizing a topic, the more ‘common ground’ techniques will help you reach the fringes of your audience and keep your message (rather than distracting debates) at the centre of attention. Give up now if your aim is to satisfy everyone. (You can’t. But maybe, you can get close).
The idea is simple: find the intersection of what different factions care about. Frame your message around that.
Let’s put these principles to the test. Here are three scenarios where common ground theory can help make messaging more impactful and inclusive:
When it comes to sensitive topics, broadcast audiences are like tinderboxes. Segmentation can help navigate some polarized territories. But it’s no fail-safe. Common ground messaging can help maximize audience reach, minimize triggers and distracting debates, and keep your supporters focussed on effective action.
Was this tip useful?
Like this tip? Share it!
