Unsubscribe any time. We respect your data. View the privacy policy.
I’m not saying don’t do heroic things. Keep that up! But when you’re telling your supporters a story of injustice, there’s only
Most of us have a hard time keeping on top of emails from people we do know, to let alone give a second
Imagine you’re seeing a 25% open rate on your emails. That means whenever you send a broadcast, 3 in every 4 recipients will
When you hear of organizations that have amassed millions of online supporters, the first question that often comes to mind is: where
Your organization and its communication style is unique. Defining it will consolidate expertise, build confidence, and help you and your co-communicators hone an
Preview text appears in most email clients in the form of a few words after or below a subject line. While it doesn’t
If your action email has one job—to get your supporter to click through to a destination—then what’s the quickest way to get
It would be a lie to claim that ‘delivery time’ is a highly influential factor in email open rates. Compared to heavyweights
To steal a mantra from our friends in journalism: don’t bury the lede. The idea might have started in newspaper offices
Think of digital pipelines as pathways that lead your supporters down progressively deeper levels of engagement. Without designing your pipelines intentionally, your supporters
How does the past experience of people on your list influence their interest in receiving ongoing email from you? It turns out
Who are your supporters? And what do they need from you to reach their potential as star advocates or loyal donors? You might
Don’t undercut a great email by hiding it behind a poor subject line. These few words have the power to make or
Is email dead? Here’s what the data says... Some people question the relevance of emails in 2026. They ask, “Can’t we just rely
You’ve sent your action or appeal broadcast. It went okay. But you’re not satisfied that enough supporters noticed it or recognized its urgency.
It’s not hard to preach to the choir. Or to mount an argument so agreeable that it won’t offend or challenge anyone. The business of wide-scale change-making affords us neither of these luxuries. Since you’re reading this, let’s assume it’s your job to reach the masses and challenge the status quo. Welcome to fiery opposition hitting you from both sides of the divide.
The more polarizing a topic, the more ‘common ground’ techniques will help you reach the fringes of your audience and keep your message (rather than distracting debates) at the centre of attention. Give up now if your aim is to satisfy everyone. (You can’t. But maybe, you can get close).
The idea is simple: find the intersection of what different factions care about. Frame your message around that.
Let’s put these principles to the test. Here are three scenarios where common ground theory can help make messaging more impactful and inclusive:
When it comes to sensitive topics, broadcast audiences are like tinderboxes. Segmentation can help navigate some polarized territories. But it’s no fail-safe. Common ground messaging can help maximize audience reach, minimize triggers and distracting debates, and keep your supporters focussed on effective action.
Was this tip useful?
Like this tip? Share it!
