Unsubscribe any time. We respect your data. View the privacy policy.
Okay, back up—what’s a ‘value proposition’? Think of your value proposition as the reason your reader should care about investing
Most organizations want to grow their online audience. Some of us rely entirely on our supporters to fuel actions and fundraising—the organizational
For several years, I drove a strategy at Animals Australia to send ‘thank-you’ emails to action takers that were jam-packed with followup
What’s the magic number of emails you need to send to maximize supporter engagement and minimize fatigue?The answer is “five”. Kidding. It would
Most email broadcast systems come packed with standard analytics. Just to be clear, here’s what we care about: Recipient volume This is the
Is email dead? Here’s what the data says... Some people question the relevance of emails in 2026. They ask, “Can’t we just rely
It can feel intuitive to place your action form elements at the end of your page—after your theory of change. However, your supporter
It would be a lie to claim that ‘delivery time’ is a highly influential factor in email open rates. Compared to heavyweights
Serious question. Success is more than a number. It’s an outcome. An increase in list size isn’t an end-goal; 1,000
Well-designed email templates are greeeat. But even the best layouts can lull readers into complacency over time. Consider mixing up your formatting occasionally
Have you ever visited a website only to notice that ads for that site seem to ‘follow’ you around the Internet? You’ve been
Of all the ‘rules’ out there for writing page headlines, this is the most transformative. If your headline sits on a petition
When it comes to targeting the best supporters for specific activities, many of us are using (or have used) the sub-list model.
Think of split testing (or AB testing) like a deathmatch for ideas. It’s the best tool we have for figuring out what works
On-page videos can be your best friend and your worst enemy. At the same time. Know the pros and cons so you
It’s not hard to preach to the choir. Or to mount an argument so agreeable that it won’t offend or challenge anyone. The business of wide-scale change-making affords us neither of these luxuries. Since you’re reading this, let’s assume it’s your job to reach the masses and challenge the status quo. Welcome to fiery opposition hitting you from both sides of the divide.
The more polarizing a topic, the more ‘common ground’ techniques will help you reach the fringes of your audience and keep your message (rather than distracting debates) at the centre of attention. Give up now if your aim is to satisfy everyone. (You can’t. But maybe, you can get close).
The idea is simple: find the intersection of what different factions care about. Frame your message around that.
Let’s put these principles to the test. Here are three scenarios where common ground theory can help make messaging more impactful and inclusive:
When it comes to sensitive topics, broadcast audiences are like tinderboxes. Segmentation can help navigate some polarized territories. But it’s no fail-safe. Common ground messaging can help maximize audience reach, minimize triggers and distracting debates, and keep your supporters focussed on effective action.
Was this tip useful?
Like this tip? Share it!
