Unsubscribe any time. We respect your data. View the privacy policy.
Serious question. Success is more than a number. It’s an outcome. An increase in list size isn’t an end-goal; 1,000
You are not your audience. Five humbling words that explain why so many messages fall flat, emails flop, and web pages
It’s not hard to preach to the choir. Or to mount an argument so agreeable that it won’t offend or challenge anyone.
Who are your supporters? And what do they need from you to reach their potential as star advocates or loyal donors? You might
You sent 100,000 emails to the wrong list... You directed people to last year’s action... You addressed everyone as “Jane”... It happens.
It would be a lie to claim that ‘delivery time’ is a highly influential factor in email open rates. Compared to heavyweights
Knowing how much or how little to say starts with being clear about your objective. Rarely is it our job to turn readers
You’ve sent your action or appeal broadcast. It went okay. But you’re not satisfied that enough supporters noticed it or recognized its urgency.
Let’s be honest, this stuff is hard. Never in human history has there been a communication medium more competitive than the Internet.
Does this sound familiar? Back up your position with facts; the more reasons you can offer, the more persuasive your argument. Right?
Think of digital pipelines as pathways that lead your supporters down progressively deeper levels of engagement. Without designing your pipelines intentionally, your supporters
Okay, back up—what’s a ‘value proposition’? Think of your value proposition as the reason your reader should care about investing
The education system taught many of us that long words and complex sentence structures are signs of sophistication. Un-learn this as fast
Sometimes, the purpose of an email can be simply to inform. But often, we’re trying to get someone somewhere. An action page. A
In 2026, more emails are being viewed on iPhones than any other device. The average iPhone affords us a measly 41 characters
It’s not hard to preach to the choir. Or to mount an argument so agreeable that it won’t offend or challenge anyone. The business of wide-scale change-making affords us neither of these luxuries. Since you’re reading this, let’s assume it’s your job to reach the masses and challenge the status quo. Welcome to fiery opposition hitting you from both sides of the divide.
The more polarizing a topic, the more ‘common ground’ techniques will help you reach the fringes of your audience and keep your message (rather than distracting debates) at the centre of attention. Give up now if your aim is to satisfy everyone. (You can’t. But maybe, you can get close).
The idea is simple: find the intersection of what different factions care about. Frame your message around that.
Let’s put these principles to the test. Here are three scenarios where common ground theory can help make messaging more impactful and inclusive:
When it comes to sensitive topics, broadcast audiences are like tinderboxes. Segmentation can help navigate some polarized territories. But it’s no fail-safe. Common ground messaging can help maximize audience reach, minimize triggers and distracting debates, and keep your supporters focussed on effective action.
Was this tip useful?
Like this tip? Share it!
